User talk:Spencerian

As most of you might have noticed, I stay atop the Matrix-related pages and update or enhance them as necessary. Since it's all a fictional world with lots of philosophical questions and few answers, speculation abounds. I have many personal theories on how things are, who is what, and so on. However, I do strive to avoid adding any of this kind of subjective commentary to any pages without a specific source. In most cases, the source is the movie events and dialogue and what logical or factual ties that support the information. Feel free to drop in and chat. I'm still getting the hang on some features here, so bear with me if my formatting of things seem to work or not (I normally use Safari in Mac OS X for editing). Spencerian 19:43, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

-Oh Dear

Thanks to fellow Matrix enthusiast Tualha, I've discovered the Wikipediholic page. I was in denial at first, until I took the test. I scored a 59. Now I'm so in denial, I need a boat and directions to the Mediterreanean Sea...

Image Tagging Image:Spencerian-Wiki.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Spencerian-Wiki.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --SCEhard T 06:47, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is a personal photo. Added GDFL attribution for fair-use. Thanks for notifying me. --Spencerian 15:02, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Keymaker.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Keymaker.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. — THOR ^=/\= 03:52, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Capture of the Cyane

I rechecked the source material and the National Archive quietly had corrected the source file without notice by the way. Captain Stewart was in commanding USS Consitution at the time of the battle. Captain Decatur was sending the report in with other issues he was reporting on to the Sec of the Navy at that time. My appologies in this regard. Tirronan 14:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. --Spencerian 21:38, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:TrinityMatrixCharacter.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TrinityMatrixCharacter.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:12, 27 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yonatan ^talk 11:12, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bluepill

I have nominated Bluepill, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bluepill. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Club Hel (The Matrix)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Club Hel (The Matrix), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Club Hel (The Matrix). Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Club Hel (The Matrix)

I have nominated Club Hel (The Matrix), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Club Hel (The Matrix). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 03:06, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article for deletion/Battlestar Wiki (3rd nom.)

The Battlestar Wiki aritlce has been nominated for deletion for the third time. Feel free to add your comments to the corresponding discussion.--DrWho42 (talk) 17:56, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Redpill

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Redpill, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Debatable whether this needs a page of its own. Entire article seems to be based upon original research, with few references to back up claims.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. magnius (talk) 22:01, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Georgestarkey pitchinglucas.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Georgestarkey pitchinglucas.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:58, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Operator (The Matrix) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operator (The Matrix) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operator (The Matrix) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 03:57, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Spencerian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Spencerian. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Skylab mutiny?

Hi! I see you've had some interest in what to do with the Skylab mutiny article. In an attempt to address concerns brought forth on its talk page and at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive271#Skylab_mutiny, I have prepared a draft of a substantially different article on the same topic at User:Ke4roh/Skylab 4 human factors. I think it's nearly ready to go, and I would appreciate your input before I take that leap. -- ke4roh (talk) 16:39, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Spencerian. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pete Frank (Flight director)

Hallo, thanks for creating this page. Just a couple of points:

It didn't need a disambiguator as there is no other article for a "Pete Frank"
If it had needed a disambiguator, it should have been "(flight director)", lower-case "f"
The {{stub}} tag should go at the bottom, not the top - see WP:ORDER

I've moved it to Pete Frank, added him as a "See also" at Peter Frank and added the reciprocal hatnote here, and moved and sorted the stub tag. Happy Editing! PamD 18:36, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you much. My wiki skill and the many Wikipedia conventions are rusty. There was an article with "Pete Frank" but you made a less sloppy disambig to make any differences and used a cleaner stub. --Spencerian (talk) 21:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Pete Frank

On 2 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pete Frank, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Apollo flight director Pete Frank was a finalist for NASA Astronaut Group 5? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pete Frank. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Pete Frank), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]